|
Australia
in the Context of a Sustainable Asia:
Corporate Governance and the Challenges of the World Summit on Sustainable
Development
25 and 26 November 2002
Hilton on the Park, Melbourne
H L Kam
CEO of CK Life Sciences international (Holdings) Inc. &
DMD of Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited
World Summit Outcome and Public-Private
Partnership
25 November 2002
I would like to talk about sustainable
development from an Asian Business Perspective.
The 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development was
held in Johannesburg. The five key areas identified for action at
the Summit were Water, Energy, Health, Agriculture and Biodiversity.
Public-private partnership was identified as the preferred vehicle
for action.
The company I work for—the Cheung Kong Group—has
launched initiatives in all five of these areas and also has participated
in a number of public-private partnerships. I would like to share
with you some of our experiences.
Before I go further though, I will briefly introduce
to you the Cheung Kong Group.
Cheung Kong Group
The Cheung Kong Group is made up of a group of listed companies
engaged in property, telecommunications, ports, infrastructure,
retail, manufacturing, media, and life sciences.
Total market capitalisation of the Cheung Kong Group
is about A$110 billion, equivalent to about 15 per cent of the total
market capitalisation of the Sydney Stock Exchange. We operate in
over 40 countries and have more than 160,000 employees worldwide.
In Australia, we have invested around A$9 billion.
Businesses include gas distribution, electricity distribution, transportation
and telecommunications; and they are conducted through Envestra,
ETSA Utilities, Powercor, Citipower, Sydney Cross City Tunnel, and
Hutchison Telecom.
Environmental sustainability is the forte of CK Life
Sciences, our biotech arm. This company is dedicated to improving
the quality of life in two areas—environmental sustainability
and human health. Through CK Life Sciences, we have participated
in public-private partnership programmes in Australia and have started
a number of environmental initiatives.
Importance of Public-Private Partnerships
I believe public-private partnerships are an important factor in
the implementation of successful sustainability efforts.
Private corporations can make great contributions
by developing and promoting products and services which facilitate
environmental sustainability. However, as private corporations are
driven by commercial objectives, unless financial returns on these
products are justified, investment will be limited.
Governments, on the other hand, can act as catalysts
to speed up the necessary reforms. Government can also generate
multiplier effects in expediting the success of efforts undertaken
by the private sector.
Governments could assume the leadership role in providing
an environment for private corporations to operate so that their
causes can be realised. Policies, incentives and, at times, legislation
could create the appropriate playing field to ensure sustainable
efforts are carried out widely, efficiently and effectively. The
role of governments in sustainable development is extremely significant.
Sustainability Does Not Mean Compromise
In addition to public-private partnerships, another very important
dimension of successful environmental programmes is the development
of win-win, non-compromising solutions for all parties concerned.
At Cheung Kong, we believe that achieving environmental
sustainability should not mean compromising on quality of life.
True sustainability means that we should not have to go back on
progress made, nor do we have to suffer sacrifices. We should always
move forward and contribute positively towards efficiency and human
comfort.
After all, sustainability should be aimed at more
than just basic survival. Sustainability should be the principle
by which we work to improve the wellbeing of mankind.
Effective environmental sustainability initiatives
should be financially viable for commercial corporations, generate
overall benefits for the country, and improve the quality of life
for mankind.
Take the example of motor vehicles. One should not
ban cars on the road because they cause pollution, one should find
ways to tackle the pollution problem. In some countries, the introduction
of unleaded fuel and legislation on emission-free vehicles are good
examples of non-compromising, win-win solutions.
Some of Cheung Kong’s Sustainability
Initiatives
In the Cheung Kong Group, we are committed to developing solutions
in which all stakeholders win. We have undertaken a number of environmental
initiatives. The principles we adopt for making decisions on participation
follow this non-compromising, win-win, scenario.
These environmental initiatives include:
- A co-combustion system that can handle 50 per cent of Hong Kong’s
municipal waste—this creates green employment and uses recycled
materials.
- Hydrogen fuel cell investment in Canada—we are the cornerstone
shareholder in a listed company aimed at supplying cars with emission
free fuel.
- An A$625 million property development which preserves 95 per cent
of the site's natural wetlands—this project not only solves
a housing problem, but also generates a conservation fund to protect
the 80 hectare wetland, together with the rare bird species that
inhabit this environment.
CK Life Sciences in Australia
I would now like to give two examples of where we believe the public-private
partnership—as well as the non-compromising, win-win principle—apply
very effectively in Australia. Both of these efforts involve CK
Life Sciences.
CK Life Sciences has identified the promotion of environmental
sustainability as one of its two missions—the other is improving
human health. Using scientifically advanced breakthrough technology,
we have developed more than 100 products. Half of these are aimed
at solving environmental issues, the remainder address human health
concerns. All of these products have their origins in our unique
yeast-based technology platform. Dormant cells of the selected yeast
strains are activated and then acclimatised to perform functions
including: nitrogen-fixation; carbohydrate-degradation for environmental
products; and, immunity enhancement capability, applied in pharmaceuticals
and animal feed additives.
The range of environmental products we have developed
includes eco-fertilisers, bioremediation solutions and animal additives.
Today, I would like to concentrate on the first two of these product
categories.
Sustainability Agenda of Australia
In our view, the eco-fertiliser and bioremediation products fit
perfectly with the sustainability agenda in Australia. According
to the Federal Government's recent Land and Water Audit Report,
it is clear that Australia faces serious soil degradation and water
quality problems—and one of their major causes is the overuse
of chemical fertilisers.
For decades, chemical fertilisers have improved productivity
yields of farmers. But many studies indicate that only one-third
of the nutrients from these fertilisers is absorbed and used by
plants—of the remaining two-thirds, a third is left in the
soil, while the other third leaches into nearby waterways.
Those chemicals that remain bound up in the soil cause
soil degradation. Those leached into the water cause pollution and
affect the biodiversity of the marine environment. For reasons including
these, sustainable agriculture has become an urgent topic for Australia.
The challenge now is to develop or identify a fertiliser
which does not leach into the environment and can supply the nutrients
crops need—nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K).
We definitely see great potential for public-private
partnerships in this area. Take, for example, the case of the Great
Barrier Reef. The Australian government should be commended for
taking a visionary role by outlining plans to tackle the Reef's
water quality problem—as evidenced by the MOU recently signed
by the Queensland Government and the Federal Government. This MOU
commits the two Governments to a range of joint actions aimed at
halting the decline in water quality on the Reef.
One activity to result from the MOU is a Productivity
Commission inquiry that, in its Draft Report, found important parts
of the Reef system may be under serious threat from the chemical-laden
sediment that flows into coastal waters every time following significant
rainfall.
Against this background, there is the opportunity
for private sector to step up efforts to develop appropriate solutions.
One of the challenges is to develop fertiliser products which do
not cause leaching and yet can generate yields similar to those
of chemical fertilisers. Currently, there are organic fertilisers
in the market which are environmentally friendly, but they do not
always generate satisfactory productivity yields for farmers.
CK Life Sciences’ eco-fertiliser, NutriSmart
At CK Life Sciences, we have developed an eco-fertiliser product
called NutriSmart—an active microbial fertiliser containing
six strains of yeasts. It does not contain pre-fixed N, P and K.
The strains are all treated to supply macronutrients by fixing N
from the air, decomposing rock phosphate into P and breaking down
K from the soil into easily absorbable forms when in contact with
the roots of plants—and when the plants are in need of these
nutrients. In essence, NutriSmart has three benefits: it enhances
crop quality, improves soil condition and is environmentally friendly.
NutriSmart can do most of the beneficial things that
chemical fertilisers do in terms of productivity, yield and cost,
but without causing the associated environmental harm of traditional
chemical fertilisers (such as leaching of excess nutrients into
nearby waterways). NutriSmart is an appropriate product for the
current agricultural environment—a case of right product and
right timing.
The product has been extensively tested in a number
of countries around the world, with favourable results. In Australia,
tests have been carried out by SARDI, a South Australian government
agency, with very positive results; and currently it is being tested
by BSES, a government agency in Queensland. NutriSmart is now in
use on more than 50 crops in a dozen different countries.
Recently, we have participated in a programme orchestrated
by the Burdekin Shire to alleviate the burden on sugar cane farmers
in the that region of Queensland. Under this plan, we offered cane
farmers limited supplies of NutriSmart at a steep discount. We asked
for an upfront payment of only $50 a tonne, with the balance of
$300 paid off interest free over nine months. During these nine
months, in order to fund amounts outstanding for the fertiliser,
farmers apply for a Government subsidy designed to encourage take-up
of innovative new technologies. Where farmers apply for but do not
receive the subsidy (or receive a subsidy of less than $300 per
tonne), their total outstanding balances will be waived.
The project not only alleviates the financial burden
on sugar cane farmers, it also gives them the opportunity to counter
those persistent accusations that cane farmers are the ones causing
pollution to the environment. Another multi-win scenario.
Private Enterprise Can Only Do So Much
But companies can only do so much. As a private enterprise, there
is not a great deal more that we can do than develop products, stage
tests and trials to prove their effectiveness, and aggressively
implement initiatives to promote their use.
These are all micro-level activities. A general change
of thinking is necessary to really promote sustainable farming—and
the speed of this change must be considerable in order to be effective.
To accelerate the adoption of sustainable farming practices requires
active leadership from government on a macro-level. This leadership
would create an attractive environment for industry practitioners
to develop and introduce solutions to the market, and make consumers
aware of the need to adopt the solutions.
Governments Take Lead in Some Areas
In the case of the Great Barrier Reef, the Queensland and Federal
Governments have demonstrated a visionary approach in conducting
the Productivity Commission study and the series of workshops with
concerned stakeholders, as well as inviting submissions from the
public to look for solutions to solve the Reef's water quality problem.
As I understand, the South Australian Government has
funded a number of tests for sustainable agriculture and the Victorian
Government has been active in developing an export-oriented organic
food industry.
These are all commendable efforts, but it is just
the beginning. There are still many actions to be taken in order
to ensure effective solutions are implemented expediently.
Steps for Government to Consider
To encourage greater take-up of eco-fertilisers as replacements
for traditional chemical products, we propose that Australian Governments
consider:
- providing research grants for the development of eco-efficient
fertilisers
- providing subsidies for the testing of eco-efficient fertilisers
- introducing targeted, performance-based incentives for farmers
to change to eco-efficient fertilisers
- developing a regulatory and legislative framework encouraging
the use of eco-efficient fertilisers and discouraging the use of
contaminating fertilisers.
We feel very strongly that some sort of carrot-and-stick
approach—a combination of incentives and regulations—should
be implemented to ensure sustainable agriculture.
California Emission Control Legislation a
Good Example
The action of the Californian Government in the US to reduce motor
vehicle emissions provides an example that Australian Governments
could productively emulate.
The California Government has passed legislation that
requires 10 per cent of the State’s motor vehicles to be emission-free
within 10 years. This is a clear target and timeline. Both are essential
ingredients in any effective plan designed to create an environment
in which the necessary research and development is carried out,
and the required business support operations are developed.
The Californian Government’s determination to
take the lead by passing legislation has had definite results. Car
manufacturers have stepped up efforts to carry out research on cars
that run on clean fuel. Gas companies have started to devise business
strategies to meet the legislated changes. Consumers have begun
to learn more about clean fuel, its applications and benefits. There
are no more debates on the issue.
This is a good case for the Australian government
to refer to for ways to speed up the adoption of sustainable farming
practices. The government can set the stage and get farmers and
the fertiliser industry prepared for the change. Incentives and
levies should all be considered to turn the concept of sustainable
land use into reality.
Protecting Precious Water Resources Through
Bioremediation
Moving from sustainable farming, I would like to discuss another
important and related subject—bioremediation. This is another
area where we see how the public-private partnership can work very
well and win-win, non-compromising solutions can be implemented
effectively.
Like fertile soil, water is another precious resource
in Australia. Government should take a leadership role in conserving
water and improving its quality. Drought has been an issue in recent
years. Developing measures to encourage recycling of water and cleaning
up polluted water would be important areas for Government activity.
It is also imperative to encourage the adoption of sustainable farming
practices that will not contaminate the environment.
Water problems such as those in the Great Barrier
Reef, the Murray Darling River System and many smaller waterways,
are very complex. While physical, chemical and biological solutions
have all been studied, the perfect solutions for recycling and cleaning
waste water, as well as preventing the water from being further
contaminated, have yet to be identified. In this matter, government
can take up many roles; it can be regulator, policy maker and, in
some cases, even end user. In this regard, the government can work
with private corporations to carry out research and develop new
solutions.
WonderTreat Offers Liquid Waste and Solid
Waste Solutions
CK Life Sciences has developed a range of bioremediation products
to treat waste water and the solid waste that leads to contamination.
The WonderTreat™ range of bioremediation products provides
effective, economical and environmentally-benign solutions for organic
waste management and water pollution.
WonderTreat™ contains microbes with specific
pollution removal functions. It provides tailored solutions for
removing bio-available nitrogen and phosphorus and reducing odours
and environmental toxins. It also reduces polymeric compounds, and
suppresses the growth of algae and pathogens.
In Australia, a few trials of WonderTreat™ have
been arranged. These include one for treatment of pig manure in
a piggery near Murray Bridge and another to treat dairy farm cow
manure (with the intention of solving the dairy discharge problem
into the lower reaches of the Murray River). Both of these initiatives
are to be conducted with the support of the South Australian Government.
Commercial tests are also in place.
Important Partnership Role of Environment
Groups
I would like to point out that, in addition to partnerships between
private enterprise and government, environmental NGOs are also an
important party to the cause of environmental initiatives. Governments
and business corporations are often led by their own agendas and
priorities, such as the political situation and monetary gains.
The NGOs, guided by ideals, are oftentimes more impartial and put
greater emphasis on the longer term benefits of mankind. They are
very focused on their ideals and can concentrate on problems without
much distraction. They can play an important role in making sure
government and private enterprise remain on course towards the effective
development of sustainable solutions.
So, while it is true that government, environmental
NGOs and commercial enterprises can work together for the common
good of the environment, how to make their partnerships work effectively
is another key question.
How To Make Partnerships Work
There are three important elements to successful partnerships. Firstly,
complementary roles—each party to the partnership must understand
its role. Governments and NGOs should address macro-level issues,
with the government taking the leadership role to create the environment
for change, maybe through passing legislation, setting policies,
introducing incentives and so on. The role of NGOs is to raise public
awareness on the issues and, at times, bring in international rapport.
Private enterprises should launch activities on the micro-level
by putting in resources and know-how to develop and market the appropriate
products and services. The efforts of the three parties should be
complementary.
Secondly, courage and open-mindedness—many governments
and NGOs have been sceptical about working with the private sector,
worrying about being labelled as 'endorsing a commercial product'.
But, for the greater benefit of sustainability, partnering with
private sector organizations, especially those who have made huge
R&D investments, can speed up progress. The key is to ensure
the outcome benefits all. There are more and more cases all over
the world in which governments, private sector organisations and
NGOs are engaging in constructive dialogues in order to formulate
policies for the promotion of products that will benefit both environmental
protection and economic development.
Thirdly, willingness to invest into the future—the
private sector should not be afraid to take bold steps in investing
in R&D and undertaking ventures which may not bring immediate
profits, but could bring good returns in the long run. It is these
pioneering private enterprises who create innovative breakthrough
products that can capture untapped opportunities when they arise.
In this regard, governments can assist with the commercial viability
of new technologies or ventures by buying innovative, environmentally-friendly
products. Setting the right policy would also greatly help in shortening
the lead time for business corporations to generate returns.
Australians Can Lead the World in Sustainable
Developments
Australia is well placed to turn these opportunities into
real commercial ventures which
could contribute to the country’s balance of payments. It
has a highly adaptive and innovative population which readily adopts
new ways of thinking and new technologies. This quality, in turn,
has fostered the growth of highly innovative thinking about ways
to tackle environmental problems.
From my previous dealings with different government
departments and agencies—and with NGOs such as ACF, NCC, Landcare,
and WWF—I can see that great expertise exists and that positive
actions have been taken.
Private sector industry colleagues have also been
innovative in their thinking and business acumen. With all parties
making effective contributions in their roles, it is almost certain
that public-private-NGO partnerships would go a long way to champion
environmentally sustainable causes. If there is any one country
that can lead the world in sustainability development, that country
is Australia.
CK Life Sciences is dedicated and committed to developing
products and solutions for environmental sustainability. We hope
we can work closely with governments, NGOs and other industry colleagues
for the eventual benefit of mankind.
|